Google disclaims labor department’s declaration that gender-based pay inequities are’ systemic’ at the company

Bellingcat reports Alexander Yevgenyevich Mishkin is a instructed armed physician for Russian spy agency

The investigative website Bellingcat has identified the second doubt responsible for poisoning Sergei Skripal as Alexander Mishkin, a doctor working for Russia’s GRU military spy agency.

The website said it had tracked down Mishkin’s real identity after securing a scanned transcript of his actual passport. It had confirmed details with people who knew him and using open informant datum, it said.

Last month Bellingcat identified the other believe, previously reputation as Ruslan Boshirov, as Col Anatoliy Chepiga, a special forces veteran.

Mishkin and Chepiga supposedly poisoned Skripal and his daughter Yulia in March applying the Soviet nerve agent novichok. Both ran into the UK expending the inaccurate the identity cards of Boshirov and Alexander Petrov.

According to Bellingcat, Petrov is in fact Mishkin, a trained armed physician working undercover for the GRU. Mishkin’s passport, issued in 2001 in St Petersburg, throws his real name. He was born in Loyga, village representatives in the Archangelsk district of northern Russia, both documents suggests.

FTAG 1 TT

HTAG 1 TTWhat is Russia’s GRU intelligence agency? HETAG 1 TT BTAG 1 TT SPTAG 2 TT SPTAG 3 TT

Powerful and mysterious, the GRU is one of Russia’s three intelligence agencies. It has been accused by the US of having taken a leading role in hacking the 2016 US presidential election.

Russia also has the FSB and SVR. The former is the sprawling arrangement that absorbed most regions of the KGB after the fall of the Soviet Union, while the latter is the part that focused on spying abroad, which became a new organize in modern Russia.

The GRU, the intelligence offstage of the Russian infantry, has always been a separate entity. All three move agents and missions abroad.BTAG 2 TT

RTAG 11 TTThe GRU went into decline in the 1990 s and there was some are talking here about disbanding it, but in 2006 it moved to new headquarters. It was considered instrumental in Russian ploys to annex Crimea in 2014 and precede interference in east Ukraine.BTAG 3 TT

RTAG 12 TTThe level of privacy surrounding the GRU is so high that there was even BTAG 4 TT BTAG 5 TT

Happy belated Equal Pay Day! The U.S. Department of Labor vouched in court today that offer unfairness at Google are systemic, The Guardian reports. Earlier this month, Google said it had closed the gender pay gap globally.

We observed systemic compensation discrepancies against maidens pretty much across the entire personnel, Department of Labor Regional Director Janette Wipper said in court today.

More specific, the DoL alleges that Google contravened federal employ laws in relation to salaries for its female employees. ButGoogle, unsurprisingly, repudiates Wippers claim.

We vehemently disagree with Ms Whippers claim, a Google spokesperson told TechCrunch in an email. Every year, we do a thorough and robust analysis of repay across genders and we have found no gender pay gap. Other than making an unjustified evidence which we heard for the first time in courtroom, the DoL hasnt supported any data, or shared its methodology.

Back in January, the DoLfiled a litigation against Google in an attempt to obtain compensation the information in the tech whale as part of a routine conformity evaluation. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs asked Google to submit information about the companys equal rights curriculum and practises in September 2015, but Google did not comply, according to the lawsuit.

Because Google is a federal contractor, it is required to let the governmental forces examine documents and other information that is relevant to the companys complying with equal engaging laws.

Like other federal contractors, Google has a legal obligation to provide relevant information requested in the course of a routine compliance evaluation, OFCCP Acting Director Thomas M. Dowdsaid in January. Despite many opportunities to produce this information willingly, Google has refused to do so. We registered this lawsuit so we can obtain the information we need to complete our evaluation.

The OFCCP was of the view that if Google did not comply, it wouldask the court to cancel all of Googles current contracts with the government, and also prevent it from procuring contracts in the future. ButGoogle said ithad catered hundreds of thousands of enters, including information related to compensation, to the OFCCP, a Google spokesperson told TechCrunch when the lawsuit surfaced in January.

At the court hearing today, Lisa Barnett Sween, one of Googles advocates, said here DoLs request is unconstitutional, The Guardian reports, announcing it a fishing expedition that are exactly no relevant to the conformity review.

Read more:

SHARE

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here